Testing primarily from a distance of around 23” (60cm) you could see any point of the screen by moving your eyes, you don’t have to keep moving your head or anything potentially straining like that. Despite the considerable width we didn’t find viewing at all uncomfortable. Although you won’t be able to focus on the whole scene at once, unless you are rather far back from the monitor, your peripheral vision is good at detecting movement (be it an enemy solider on Battlefield 3 or another vehicle on Dirt 3). Coupled with the width, which engages your peripheral vision nicely, the experience becomes quite absorbing. Because FOV on most games is tied to aspect ratio and not resolution the second screenshot for each title shows how much you’d see on a 2560 x 1440 monitor, too.īeing able to see more of your game environment is certainly nice from an immersion point of view.
The screenshots below demonstrate how much extra you see at any one time at 2560 x 1080 compared to 1920 x 1080. This means for most game titles these monitors let you see more horizontally compared to other monitors whilst providing the same vertical viewing experience.Īll of the games we tested supported the 2560 x 1080 resolution (and used Hor+) to give a significant boost to horizontal FOV. The vast majority of modern game titles use what’s known as ‘Hor+’ to scale the default FOV, meaning that the horizontal FOV expands according to aspect ratio whilst the vertical FOV remains static. But it’s not just the physical size that is impressive, it’s also the improved horizontal Field of View (FOV) often provided. Multiple web pages or multiple applications running side-by-side.īy really filling up your horizontal field of view and engaging a bit of peripheral vision 21:9 provides great gaming immersion. Viewing a single webpage, for example, would typically give you a lot of ‘white space’.īut what this monitor is really crying out for, on the desktop, is a bit of multi-tasking. Combined with the considerable physical width of the 21:9 aspect ratio this gives you quite a panoramic look to the desktop.
#Switchresx 2560 1080 not activated invalid full#
These 29” models are interesting because they employ a 2560 x 1080 resolution, combining the horizontal component of the WQHD resolution with the vertical component of the Full HD resolution. In this article we compared 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) to 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) to give you an idea of how much extra ‘real estate’ you gain on the desktop from the higher resolution. Further information on supporting our work. Where possible, you’ll be redirected to your nearest store. But how does this shape the whole computing experience when everything is switched on?Īs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases made using the below link. Indeed putting them next to a 27” 16:9 monitor it is obvious that there is a huge horizontal versus vertical bias. You will no doubt have seen many pictures of ‘ultra widescreen’ (sometimes called ‘super widescreen’) monitors and been intrigued by their horizontally stretched appearance. Using a 29″ model in this example, which is a similar height to a 23″ 16:9 screen but significantly wider and has a similar pixel density at ~96 PPI (Pixels Per Inch).
This article documents our experiences with the panoramic aspect ratio on the desktop, in games and in movies. This turned out to be an excellent monitor in many ways and we really took to the aspect ratio in ways we didn’t expect. We have reviewed the AOC q2963Pm (Q2963PQ) which is one of the models using a 21:9 LG AH-IPS panel. LG Display and Samsung have now released AH-IPS (In-Plane Switching), PLS (Plane to Line Switching) and VA (Vertical Alignment) panels which use the even wider 21:9 aspect ratios and a 2560 x 1080 resolution. With decent monitors in the setup it’s not a particularly cheap option, there are bezels to get in the way and 3 power cables to consider. Some have taken to setting up multiple monitors in an Eyefinity or Nvidia surround type setup. For some users, though, even 16:9 is too square and they crave even more width. Some people enjoy the widescreen experience, others crave more relatively vertical space and cling to 16:10 where possible for widescreens. Widescreen monitors are now omnipresent, with the 16:9 aspect ratio the current mainstream standard.
0 kommentar(er)
